不安

  • 英格丽·褒曼 马蒂亚斯·维曼 雷娜特·曼哈特
  • 120分钟
  • Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a compani… Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto there's no place like home is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage there's no sex like marital sex. Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the fairy godmother who speaks the last words in the movie.
剧情简介
影片影评
经典台词
人物角色
《不安》(La Paura)是意大利导演罗伯托·罗西里尼于1954年执导的一部心理惊悚片。影片讲述了一对年轻夫妇在意大利南部乡村度假时,逐渐陷入一场由恐惧和猜疑引发的心理危机的故事。女主角伊莎贝拉(Isabella)与丈夫马尔科(Marco)来到一个宁静的小镇,希望借助自然风光和清新的空气缓解她的精神焦虑。然而,随着他们与当地渔民吉安卡洛(Giancarlo)的相遇,以及周围环境的压抑氛围,伊莎贝拉开始感受到一种莫名的不安。她变得越来越敏感和多疑,怀疑丈夫与吉安卡洛之间存在某种隐秘的关系。这种心理状态逐渐演变为偏执和疯狂,最终导致家庭关系的破裂和悲剧的发生。影片以第二次世界大战后欧洲社会的精神创伤为背景,探讨了人类内心深处的恐惧、孤独与不安全感。罗西里尼通过细腻的心理描写和极具张力的叙事手法,展现了个体在面对未知和不确定性时的心理崩溃过程。
《不安》是罗西里尼创作生涯中一部被低估的杰作,它完美融合了新现实主义的纪实风格与心理惊悚的戏剧张力。从剧本层面看,改编自茨威格同名小说的故事本身具有精准的心理解剖力,但罗西里尼并未流于廉价悬念,而是用缓慢的节奏和大量面部特写(尤其是英格丽·褒曼的瞳孔震颤)将恐惧内化为一种存在状态。台词简练而富有哲思,每一句都像是对战后德国集体道德的拷问。演技方面,英格丽·褒曼贡献了职业生涯中最具层次感的表演之一:她既演出了上流贵妇的优雅脆弱,又展现了濒临崩溃时的神经质与歇斯底里——特别是在被勒索者纠缠的几场戏中,她颤抖的手指、游离的眼神与刻意维持的微笑形成惊人对比。男配角马蒂亚斯·维曼(饰丈夫)则以一种近乎沉静到可怕的方式诠释了知识分子的冷漠与宽容,这种反差反而强化了女主角的孤独。历史价值上,《不安》与罗西里尼此前的新现实主义作品(如《罗马,不设防的城市》)形成有趣对照:外部战争结束,内部战争开始。影片通过个人出轨与勒索的通俗情节,隐喻了纳粹时期德国人的“集体恐惧”——对过去的愧疚、对惩罚的焦虑、对重新生活的不安。导演放弃了早期作品中强烈的政治批判符号,转而用心理空间替代物理废墟,这种转型后来影响了安东尼奥尼关于现代人疏离感的探索。此外,影片的摄影(如阴郁的室内光影、慕尼黑街头的雨夜)和配乐(压抑的弦乐)共同营造出一种窒息感,让观众与女主角一同陷入梦魇。尽管部分节奏稍显拖沓,但整体上《不安》是一部关于人性弱点的永恒寓言,至今仍能引发共鸣。
💬
你真的觉得这里很安全吗?
💬
我只是想让你开心一点。
💬
你总是这样,控制不了自己的情绪。
💬
我看到他看你的眼神,我不喜欢。
💬
也许我们该回罗马去。
💬
你相信我吗?
💬
有时候,最可怕的不是别人,而是你自己。
💬
你有没有想过,也许是我疯了?
艾琳
🎭演员:英格丽·褒曼
艾琳是影片的核心与悲剧化身。她表面疏离而克制,实则内心早已被愧疚与焦虑掏空。褒曼赋予了这个角色一种优雅的脆弱感——她每一次欲言又止的停顿,每一次强装镇定的微笑,都精准传达了中产阶级女性在婚姻中的隐性屈服。艾琳的出轨并非出于激情,而是对丈夫冷漠的控制欲的一种无意识反抗,但当反抗被揭露,她又立刻退回传统的受害者角色。她最终的崩溃不仅是对自己说谎的惩罚,更是对整个社会规训系统(丈夫代表理性与秩序)的无声控诉。罗西里尼通过大量面部特写让观众直视她逐步瓦解的心理防线,艾琳不是一个简单的通奸者,而是被恐惧异化的现代人缩影。
阿尔伯特
🎭演员:马蒂亚斯·维曼
阿尔伯特是影片中最复杂也最具争议的角色。他不是一个粗暴恶毒的丈夫,相反,他冷静、智慧、事业有成,在最初出场时甚至显得体贴。然而他选择用私家侦探、匿名信和心理陷阱来对付妻子,而不是直接沟通,暴露了他内心对失控的深层恐惧。他的“爱”实则是对一个完美婚内伴侣的占有欲——当这个精密模型出现裂痕,他宁愿亲手摧毁它也不愿修补。维曼的演技妙在绝不夸张,他用平稳的语调和礼貌的微笑包裹住冷酷的控制,让观众不寒而栗。阿尔伯特的存在揭示了恐惧的传染性:他从科学家的理性出发,却陷入偏执的推理游戏,最终自己也成为恐惧的囚徒。
约翰
🎭演员:库尔特·克罗伊格
约翰是艾琳的年轻情人,也是推动剧情向惊悚发展的催化剂。他表面上热情、不羁,代表了一种对陈旧婚姻秩序的挑战,实则同样自私且缺乏担当。当他意识到艾琳想要结束关系时,立刻用恐吓信和跟踪来实施报复,暴露了他把女性当作征服物而非独立个体的本质。克罗伊格的表演带有一种神经质的青春躁动,与维曼的冷静形成鲜明对比。约翰的存在揭示了恐惧的另一个来源:不被承认的激情同样会蜕变为暴力。他是战后德国失落一代的象征——在废墟中找不到方向,便通过占有他人来确认自我的存在。

同主演

  • DVD国语
  • HD中字
  • HD中字
  • HD
  • HD
  • HD
  • HD
  • DVD